Video Games Suck  
  Create an account
· Home
· Article Archive
· Downloads
· Forums
· Private Messages
· Screenshots
· Search
· Submit a Review
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Your Account


Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
234 guest(s) and
0 member(s)

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
Call of Duty: Ghosts
Posted on Monday, December 16 @ 22:12:08 EST by suislide
FPS reviewstrueboy012 writes "The review is finally here, motherfuckers! Click the "Read more" link so you can see how shitty this game is. Really. Specially the PC version. It's a FUCKING JOKE.

I really had great expectations for this game, but again Infinity Fags gave us a misleading game because it has BARELY anything to do with the fucking trailer. And mostly ALL the stuff in this game is a joke. I can't believe they're showing off their "new" AI: fish that move out of the way. "OMG OMG OMG NEXT GENERATION OMG OMG OMG" that's how they were showing their "new" AI. And the PC version... HORRIBLE. The game needs 6GB of RAM to fucking run! Actually a random guy created a patch by himself and proved that this game needs MUCH LESS than 6GB. And what Infinity Fags do? They threatened to sue him if he didn't remove the patch. REALLY!? A random guy did your job and you guys don't even thank him? Wow. Just wow. The multiplayer's size is 25 GB and the full game's size is 70 GB. I was like "Fuck yeah! 4K uncompressed textures!" Well guess what? I was WRONG. And they can't even explain why it's that big. So it's full of shit then?

Anyway, let's review this thing that Infinity Fags call "a next gen game":

Gameplay: The shitty maps they made for this game are full of camping spots and more gamebreaking perks. Your life expectancy in an average COD Ghosts multiplayer is 9 seconds. It's ridiculous the fact that they're showing off everything they added in this game: Squads, soldier customization, blablabla... like if those things were never seen before. Meanwhile, the PC version is horribly optimized. I am supposed to get 120 FPS with those "graphics" and I get only about 40-50. Genius.

Graphics: If they call these "next-gen" then they are the shittiest graphics I've ever seen in a Next-gen game. Still looks like COD 4 (released in 2007).

Sound: There are so many things wrong with the gun sounds I won't even waste my time mentioning them. However the dog sounds and voice acting are kind of OK.

Realism: A pop-up saying ERROR 404 just appeared in front of my PC. This game is NOT realistic at ALL.

Story: It's just about dogs, dogs and more dogs. Did I say dogs? And I think I forgot dogs, too. Hot dogs, cold dogs... This game can be renamed to "Army of dogs".

Overall, this game is BAD, for being a Next-gen game. Unless you were a camping fag in the previous COD titles, this is just a waste of money. And the PC version... Don't even look at the price.

Console version:

PC version:
Related Links
· FPS reviews
· News by suislide

Most read story in FPS reviews:
Half-Life 2

Article Rating
Average Score: 4.18
Votes: 16

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Very Good


 Printer Friendly  Printer Friendly

 Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

Re: Call of Duty: Ghosts (Score: 1)
by Suislide (FUCK YOU@penis in my on Monday, December 16 @ 22:12:29 EST
(User Info | Send a Message)
This is a pretty shit review. I don't know why I posted it.

Just says TRY HARD to me.

[ Reply to This ]

Re: Call of Duty: Ghosts (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 17 @ 00:34:09 EST
Started out good but then you kinda skimped out on the actual content. I played this game once on a PS3 and was actually amazed at how much the graphics sucked dick, I swear MW2 looked better I don't know how.

[ Reply to This ]

Re: Call of Duty: Ghosts (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 18 @ 22:31:11 EST
You guy should have statues built in your fuckin honour. You are the only ones who actually make a real review, everyone else deserve to die at hand of mutants dire moths. Greetings from argentina, sry for my shitty english

[ Reply to This ]

Re: Call of Duty: Ghosts (Score: 1)
by TheKrustaceox on Monday, December 23 @ 08:23:08 EST
(User Info | Send a Message)
No, no your review is actually good and Suislide knows it, he is jealous his black asshole off. Believe me i follow this site from the beginning of time, it's been a while since i read a good/fun/true stuff that is not from Suislide or the older users of this site.

Keep up your reviews and hope that this sellfish idiot post them and realise this site is now plagued by retarded console kids arguing about videogames like it is a serious topic (names cBox,zachofat and others i didn't even bothered memorizing) whose console shit needs to be wiped out of this site if there are at least a hope for it's salvation.

You even made me log on my account for this, congrats.

[ Reply to This ]

Re: Call of Duty: Ghosts (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 12 @ 21:18:30 EST
You should have mentioned that the mp gameplay sucks donkey dick and I am will bet my life savings that it is the same donkey part on all platforms. 10 minute long Nanny state games =SHIT. Average lifespan of 9 seconds =SHIT. Who plays this SHIT and why? Fuck Bitch Scoping nerds. Fuck campers and fuck Activision for'publishing' such a SHIT online game a fucknGAIN!!!

[ Reply to This ]

Re: Call of Duty: Ghosts (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Friday, August 15 @ 06:00:53 EDT
Best and most accurate review I've seen, good dog. I mean job* ^^

[ Reply to This ]

Re: Call of Duty: Ghosts (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Sunday, October 12 @ 23:49:39 EDT
"Disgraceful to say the least. At times like these, they choose to capitalise from the brave Kurdish fighters...They should be ashamed of air max 1 [] themselves!" Another wrote: "Wtf this is our traditional uniform it is not for every one.[sic]"
Back in early nike air max shoes [] March 2014, when the rumblings of a third and final Sex and the City movie began to make nike air max 95 [] their rounds, Sarah Jessica Parker set the record straight with Ellen. "I've tried to make up some interesting louis vuitton outlet stores [] answers every time I've been asked this question lately," she confessed. "And, the truth of the matter is, air max 90 infrared [] there has been no real conversation about a third movie at all."
When the original photos were nike air max [] placed next to the idealized versions, the results were coach outlet [] striking. Some participants clearly preferred their faces with dramatically larger eyes and more defined cheekbones, while others' ideal faces were almost replicas of their real-life portraits.
Most of it was improvised. The three lead actors had nothing nike air max griffey [] but a 35-page outline, and various messages throughout the shoot that would tell them their next location, to nike air max ltd [] work with. For the most part, they were reacting honestly to the many strange things they encountered in air max 90 [] the woods including those teeth.
Fashion controversies typically fall into one of three categories. There are willfully nike air max 2015 [] offensive items (remember those "Eat Less" T-shirts?). There are the ones that are accidentally offensive, but should probably louis vuitton outlet online [] still have been caught and pulled from sale (like Urban Outfitters' recent "bloody" Kent State sweatshirt). And, finally, coach factory outlet online store [] there are those controversies that are just a tad trumped-up.

[ Reply to This ]

Video Games Screenshots Movies Images Reviews News New Video Game Sucks VGS Online
Logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owner. Comments are property of their posters, the rest is ©VGS
Page Generation: 0.135 Seconds