Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Online
76 guest(s) and 0 member(s)
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
Yeah, he explained why they released it for the consoles first, no surprise there (albeit completely silly and stupid, this is old news). He did not say that they deliberately screwed up GTA4.
I know, that's the point where an intelligent and capable of critical thinking mind would notice that they WOULD DO FUCKING ANYTHING TO RAISE THE CONSOLE MARKET SALES, and where a dull mind would only notice why they release it first on console. This is what society is prompting in colleges, schools, mass media, etc... : people incapable of making conclusions by their own, and only thinking what they literally see and are said.
berzerker wrote:
They didn't decide to make GTA4 PC more expensive than GTA4 console, not to release it at all, to make it Vista-only or whatever, only to delay the PC port a bit.
The port fucking sucks, when that happens is of little importance if it's Vista, MS DOS or whatever.
berzerker wrote:
Then why didn't they develop it properly and just make it more expensive? It would not have damaged their name as much and may have given them more profit too.
Because THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO ENJOY IT ON PC, THEY FUCKING WANT YOU TO BUY A CONSOLE IN ORDER TO PLAY IT DECENTLY.
berzerker wrote:
If they were to do it the same next time then I might consider agreeing with you, but for now it seems it is simply a fucked up port like we had so many in the past.
In fact this is the second time, they have done the same with the Bully port (although it's even more broken and unplayable). I remember last year when a member of the Rock$tar staff was saying that the pc port wouldn't be a "port", instead it was going to be fully rebuilt and blah blah blah... all bullshit. How do you explain it with your "I only believe literal statements" mind ?
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:16 pm
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
Kasrkin wrote:
I know, that's the point where an intelligent and capable of critical thinking mind would notice that they WOULD DO FUCKING ANYTHING TO RAISE THE CONSOLE MARKET SALES
The undisputed fact is that Rockstar has taken some measures to increase console game sales at the expense of PC games sales. What conclusion can we draw from that fact?
You assert that it follows that Rockstar would do anything to sell more consoles games, and I assert that there is quite a gap between taking some measures on the one hand and doing anything on the other.
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:45 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
Kasrkin, you're a pretty smart guy (girl?), and everything you say has some species of truth to it, it's just that you have too much anger, and you jump the gun and make far fetched conclusions.
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:18 pm
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
Yeah, most things he say could be true, it is just very unlikely they really are.
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:25 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
No, everything he says is true, but not for the reasons he thinks so.
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:44 pm
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
puk wrote:
No, everything he says is true, but not for the reasons he thinks so.
So jews are really to blame for everything and Rockstar really deliberately fucked up GTA4 PC, or do I misunderstand you again?
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:29 pm
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
berzerker wrote:
puk wrote:
No, everything he says is true, but not for the reasons he thinks so.
So jews are really to blame for everything and Rockstar really deliberately fucked up GTA4 PC, or do I misunderstand you again?
It's mainly Zionists, but they're usually Jews.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:42 am
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
berzerker wrote:
puk wrote:
No, everything he says is true, but not for the reasons he thinks so.
So jews are really to blame for everything and Rockstar really deliberately fucked up GTA4 PC, or do I misunderstand you again?
u misunderstood:
-the Jewish Lobby is very strong in America
-Rockstar did not intend to sabotage GTA, but it knew it was sabotaging GTA.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:08 am
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
[quote="puk"]
berzerker wrote:
-the Jewish Lobby is very strong in America
+ it's control over the media, which of course is the best lobby to have.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:32 am
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
Here's some HQ 1600x900's of Mirror's Edge.....looks good, would obviously look better at 1920x1200.
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:38 am
captnPugwash_halabalobale
Banned
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Posts: 670
Location: AfghanWarriorsClub (AWC)
Pogma9 wrote:
Here's some HQ 1600x900's of Mirror's Edge.....looks good, would obviously look better at 1920x1200.
all artists in responsible for mirrors edge where hardcore jews who observe Shabbat, Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur..etc
The game that pushed the limits of what's good, clean videogame fun has made its journey from the land of the PC to the PlayStation, and we can thankfully say that it's journey has been worthwhile.
They are probably involved in the conspiracy too.
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:25 pm
Kasrkin
Troll
Joined: Feb 25, 2007
Posts: 193
puk wrote:
Kasrkin, you're a pretty smart guy (girl?), and everything you say has some species of truth to it, it's just that you have too much anger, and you jump the gun and make far fetched conclusions.
Yeah I'm a Suislide wannabe no seriously, videogames really drive me crazy. One of the only times I wanted to kill somebody was a kid from Gamespot who posted to the article of the Gears of War port to pc (like 2 fucking years later) that he was unhappy it would be released on pc (Microsoft ass licker) because it was developed for xbox (lie, it was developed for pc) and its gameplay only belongs to xbox (lie, xbox stole it from pc and consolized it).
berzerker wrote:
Then IGN was wrong in their PSX review of GTA too:
I have read in IGN that the first game in which you could wield doble weapons was Halo 1, so I don't care about what IGN says. I remember back in 1997 how it was on PS1 first and months later on pc.
I have read in IGN that the first game in which you could wield doble weapons was Halo 1, so I don't care about what IGN says. I remember back in 1997 how it was on PS1 first and months later on pc.
Then not only IGN but also gamespot is involved in the conspiracy to cover this up, because they reviewed the PC version on 28 February 1998 and the PSX version only on 30 June 1998. Obviously you cannot be mistaken, so both Gamespot and IGN must be wrong.
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:19 pm
captnPugwash_halabalobale
Banned
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Posts: 670
Location: AfghanWarriorsClub (AWC)
berzerker wrote:
Kasrkin wrote:
I have read in IGN that the first game in which you could wield doble weapons was Halo 1, so I don't care about what IGN says. I remember back in 1997 how it was on PS1 first and months later on pc.
Then not only IGN but also gamespot is involved in the conspiracy to cover this up, because they reviewed the PC version on 28 February 1998 and the PSX version only on 30 June 1998. Obviously you cannot be mistaken, so both Gamespot and IGN must be wrong.
i see you have gathered the necessary evidence to present your argument in the court of law
_________________ --= KHYBER PASS =--
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:30 pm
Kasrkin
Troll
Joined: Feb 25, 2007
Posts: 193
berzerker wrote:
Kasrkin wrote:
I have read in IGN that the first game in which you could wield doble weapons was Halo 1, so I don't care about what IGN says. I remember back in 1997 how it was on PS1 first and months later on pc.
Then not only IGN but also gamespot is involved in the conspiracy to cover this up, because they reviewed the PC version on 28 February 1998 and the PSX version only on 30 June 1998. Obviously you cannot be mistaken, so both Gamespot and IGN must be wrong.
These are the US release dates, because GTA was released first on PS1 IN EUROPE because US society is one of the most hypocritical and they thought it was too violent for them.
Last quarter of 1997-> PS1 in Europe
February 1998-> PC
June 1998-> PS1 in US
this case has taken a 180 degree turn considering the fresh evidence presented by kaskarin. does the defendant have any shit to throw? if not i shall pronounce the ver-dick-it
_________________ --= KHYBER PASS =--
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:13 am
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
captnPugwash_halabalobale wrote:
this case has taken a 180 degree turn considering the fresh evidence presented by kaskarin. does the defendant have any shit to throw? if not i shall pronounce the ver-dick-it
Have you actually checked if his link supports his claim? I did and it doesn't.
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:37 am
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
Kasrkin wrote:
GTA was released first on PS1 IN EUROPE
That it was released in Europe before the US is supported by this link (december 1997), which unfortunately does not specify PSX or PC. I could not find further information.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 4 of 6Goto page Previous1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Next
bummy
no seriously, videogames really drive me crazy. One of the only times I wanted to kill somebody was a kid from Gamespot who posted to the article of the Gears of War port to pc (like 2 fucking years later) that he was unhappy it would be released on pc (Microsoft ass licker) because it was developed for xbox (lie, it was developed for pc) and its gameplay only belongs to xbox (lie, xbox stole it from pc and consolized it).
